Lthere is The U.S. Supreme Court should, barring a major surprise, reject criminal immunity invoked by Donald Trump as a former president, but the extent of its decision will depend on how quickly the ruling is delivered.
By deciding on February 28 to take up the matter, the highest court in the United States further delayed the federal trial of the former Republican president for trying to illegally overturn the results of the 2020 election, which was won by Democrat Joe Biden.
The subject of four separate criminal cases, Donald Trump is doing everything possible to try as late as possible, at least after the November election.
The vast majority of legal experts predict a dismal failure for Donald Trump, both on trial and on appeal, despite the conservative majority on the Supreme Court, of which he appointed three of the nine members.
Steven Schwinn, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Illinois at Chicago, says he expects “a majority and perhaps a unanimous decision against Trump.” “But even if the Court hands Trump a decisive and final defeat, I think the prosecution will have a hard time getting to trial before the election.”
Because the trial, originally scheduled for March, was postponed indefinitely due to of referral of The Supreme Court, can be held, nine judges should make a decision soon.
“There is one window left, but it is narrow and closes. They have to act quickly, in which case there is a chance that the trial could start in the fall, late August or early September,” explains former federal prosecutor Randall Eliason, professor of criminal law at George Washington University. “That’s what makes it a very special case that warrants a really quick decision.”
Related Posts
The attacker of the Slovak prime minister in court, Robert Fico, is still in serious condition
une bataille entre gloire et déshonneur pour l’armée française
